Alternatives

TheirStack alternatives

TheirStack is a strong product for its audience: go-to-market teams get job postings joined to technographics and buying-intent signals, transparent credit pricing from $49/month, and an archive back to 2021. Teams tend to look for alternatives when their need is a live job product rather than sales research—hourly freshness, expiry tracking, and delivery into their own infrastructure—or when credits shared across data types make job-only costs hard to predict.

Provider figures checked August 18, 2026 from public pricing and product pages.

What are the best TheirStack alternatives?

The alternatives below approach job data from that product side and others. Jobo is listed first—this is our site, and the head-to-head comparison linked alongside quotes both providers' published numbers—followed by providers focused on aggregation breadth, historical datasets, and market analytics.

  1. Jobo (that's us)

    Jobo indexes 4M+ jobs per month from 150+ ATS platforms and 200,000+ career sites—career pages only, no third-party aggregators. Listings refresh hourly, carry AI-enriched fields and matched company data, and can be pushed to your own database on a 15-minute cycle or exported as CSV, JSON, or Parquet.

    Best for
    Job boards and products that want data delivered, not polled
    Coverage
    150+ platforms; 200,000+ career sites, sourced directly
    Refresh
    95% of new postings within 3 hours
    Price from
    $29/month, or $3.00 per 1,000 jobs with no plan
  2. Fantastic.Jobs

    Fantastic.Jobs blends hourly-refreshed ATS career-site data with aggregated postings from LinkedIn, Wellfound, and Y Combinator, enriched by 20+ AI fields and matched company data. A six-month backfill API helps new job boards start populated. Plans run $95 to $750 per month with caps on both jobs and API requests, sold directly and through RapidAPI and Apify.

    Best for
    AI-enriched ATS data with job-board aggregation
    Coverage
    54 ATS platforms; 200,000+ career sites; 3M+ career-site and 11M+ job-board jobs/month
    Refresh
    Hourly; 95% of new jobs within 3 hours
    Price from
    $95/month
    Jobo vs Fantastic.Jobs
  3. Coresignal

    Coresignal sells multi-source public-web data—468M+ job postings alongside 70M+ company records and 895M+ employee profiles—so jobs can be joined to firmographic and people data from one vendor. Bulk datasets ship in Parquet or JSONL with history since 2020. Credit plans start at $49 per month with a job posting costing one credit.

    Best for
    Jobs joined to company and people data
    Coverage
    468M+ job postings; archive since 2020; 500,000+ listings added daily
    Refresh
    Daily dataset delivery; 24/7 discovery
    Price from
    $49/month (Mini, 2,500 credits)
    Jobo vs Coresignal
  4. JobsPikr

    JobsPikr, from the makers of PromptCloud, positions itself as labor-market intelligence: deduplicated job feeds with ML enrichment—standardized titles, inferred salary, skills, seniority—plus dashboards and a job search API. History runs from 2019 and the platform carries ISO-27001 and GDPR compliance. Plan tiers are published in credits, but prices are quoted through sales.

    Best for
    Enriched feeds and labor-market analytics
    Coverage
    1B+ records from 70K+ sources; history from 2019; 100+ countries
    Refresh
    Daily; 1M+ records updated per day
    Price from
    On request
    Jobo vs JobsPikr
  5. JSearch

    JSearch, by OpenWeb Ninja, is a search API rather than a dataset: each request returns live postings and salary data drawn from Google for Jobs and the major boards. There is no bulk export or history, and plans meter requests—a free 200-request month, then $25 to $150 per month with per-request rates beyond—sold directly and on RapidAPI.

    Best for
    Live job search via Google for Jobs
    Coverage
    Live listings from LinkedIn, Indeed, Glassdoor, and ZipRecruiter via Google for Jobs
    Refresh
    Real-time search; no archive
    Price from
    Free plan (200 requests/month); Pro $25/month
    Jobo vs JSearch
  6. LinkUp

    LinkUp indexes jobs exclusively and directly from employer websites—no boards, no aggregators—which is why it can claim precise counts, live source URLs, and accurate removal dates back to 2007. Data ships as datasets and feeds into Snowflake, the major clouds, or FTP, with jobs mapped to SOC/O*NET and companies to tickers. Pricing is custom, sold by demo.

    Best for
    Survivorship-clean history for research
    Coverage
    350M jobs indexed since 2007 from 86,000 employer websites; 195 countries
    Refresh
    Nightly adds and removals; optional continuous delivery
    Price from
    Custom

Which one should you choose?

Neither product wins every use case. These are the honest splits, based on what each is built for.

Choose Jobo if

  • You are building a job product—board, search, or matching—where 95% of new postings within 3 hours and free expired-job tracking decide whether users trust the listings.
  • You want data delivered, not polled: continuous 15-minute sync into PostgreSQL, Supabase, Bolt, MongoDB, Elasticsearch, Algolia, and Meilisearch, plus Parquet, CSV, and JSON exports for pipelines.
  • You want billing that never makes a job compete with a company lookup for the same unit—jobs are the only billed unit, and API requests are free.
  • You index 4m+ fresh jobs a month sourced from career pages directly, with matched company data included rather than sold as a separate credit cost.

Choose TheirStack if

  • You sell to companies, not job seekers: hiring signals joined to 33k tracked technologies and buying-intent data are a genuinely different product than raw listings.
  • You need history—TheirStack's archive reaches back to 2021 across 352k sources, where Jobo sells fresh flow, not an archive.
  • Your usage is spiky: $49/month entry credits that roll over for 12 months suit irregular research workloads better than a monthly included-jobs pool.

What should you check before switching?

The questions that decide whether an alternative to TheirStack actually fits, answered with published numbers.

Is Jobo a good alternative to TheirStack?
For live job products, yes: Jobo sources from 150+ ATS platforms with hourly refresh, tracks expired jobs at no cost, and pushes data into your own database on a 15-minute cycle. TheirStack remains the better fit for sales intelligence built on hiring signals, technographics, and its archive back to 2021.
What is the difference between Jobo and TheirStack?
Audience and unit of value. Jobo sells fresh, career-site-direct listings with push delivery, billed per delivered job. TheirStack sells jobs joined to technographics and buying-intent signals, billed in credits shared across data types and aimed at go-to-market teams.
How does Jobo pricing compare with TheirStack pricing?
Jobo plans run $29 to $499 per month with a monthly included-jobs pool, or $3.00 per 1,000 jobs with no subscription; API requests are never billed. TheirStack's credit plans run $49 to $5,500 per month, one credit per job, with unused credits rolling over for 12 months.
Does TheirStack cover more jobs than Jobo?
The numbers measure different things. TheirStack publishes a cumulative archive—231M jobs back to 2021 across 352k sources. Jobo publishes flow: 4M+ fresh jobs indexed per month from career pages, with a stated discovery window and expiry tracking. An archive answers research questions; a fresh flow keeps a live product current.
Can I use Jobo for hiring-signal sales intelligence?
Partly. Jobo listings include matched company data at no extra cost, so new-posting alerts by company work. But Jobo does not sell technographics or buying-intent datasets—if scoring accounts by technology stack is the product, TheirStack's joined data is the stronger base.

Compare with your own queries.

Every account starts with a $5 free starting balance—no credit card required. Run your niche's searches and judge the coverage yourself.